Timer Benchmarks Save

Benchmark of different timer implementations(min-heap, red-black tree, timing wheel) 不同数据结构实现的定时器测试

Project README

timer-benchmark

测试不同的数据结构(最小堆、四叉堆、红黑树、时间轮)实现的定时器的性能差异。

as Hashed and Hierarchical Timing Wheels implies

a timer module has 3 component routines:

// start a timer that will expire after `interval` unit of time
// return an unique id of the pending timer
int Start(interval, expiry_action)

// cancel a timer identified by `timer_id`
void Cancel(timer_id)

// per-tick bookking routine
// in single-thread timer scheduler implementions, this routine will run timeout actions
int Update(now)

use min-heap, quaternary heap( 4-ary heap ), balanced binary search tree( red-black tree ), hashed timing wheel and Hierarchical timing wheel to implement different time scheduler.

Big(O) complexity of algorithm

FIFO means whether same deadline timers expire in FIFO order.

FIFO的意思是相同到期时间的定时器是否按FIFO的顺序到期

algo Start() Cancel() Tick() FIFO implemention file
binary heap 最小堆 O(log N) O(log N) O(1) no PriorityQueueTimer
4-ary heap 四叉堆 O(log N) O(log N) O(1) no QuatHeapTimer
redblack tree 红黑树 O(log N) O(log N) O(log N) no RBTreeTimer
hashed timing wheel 时间轮 O(1) O(1) O(1) yes HashedWheelTimer
hierarchical timing wheel 多级时间轮 O(1) O(1) O(1) yes HHWheelTimer

How To Build

Obtain CMake

Obtain CMake first.

  • sudo apt install cmake on Ubuntu or Debian
  • sudo yum install cmake on Redhat or CentOS
  • choco install cmake on Windows use choco

run shell command

  • mkdir cmake-build; cd cmake-build && cmake -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release .. && cmake --build .

Benchmarks

Benchmark result

Win10 x64 6-core 3.93MHz CPU

Benchmark Time CPU Iterations
BM_PQTimerAdd 441 ns 433 ns 1947826
BM_QuadHeapTimerAdd 429 ns 427 ns 1866667
BM_RBTreeTimerAdd 1231 ns 1228 ns 1120000
BM_HashWheelTimerAdd 430 ns 436 ns 1792000
BM_HHWheelTimerAdd 669 ns 672 ns 1000000
BM_PQTimerCancel 668 ns 656 ns 1000000
BM_QuadHeapTimerCancel 351 ns 349 ns 2240000
BM_RBTreeTimerCancel 1685 ns 1692 ns 896000
BM_HashWheelTimerCancel 632 ns 641 ns 1000000
BM_HHWheelTimerCancel 942 ns 953 ns 1000000
BM_PQTimerTick 29.8 ns 29.8 ns 23578947
BM_QuadHeapTimerTick 30.3 ns 30.5 ns 23578947
BM_RBTreeTimerTick 30.2 ns 29.8 ns 23578947
BM_HashWheelTimerTick 31.2 ns 30.8 ns 21333333
BM_HHWheelTimerTick 30.5 ns 30.7 ns 22400000

Conclusion

  • rbtree timer Add/Cancel has not so good performance compare to other implementations;
  • 红黑树的插入和删除相比其它实现,表现都弱了一些;
  • binary min heap is a good choice, easy to implement and have a good performance, but without FIFO expiration order(heap sort is unstable);
  • 最小堆是一个不错的选择,代码实现简单性能也不俗,但不支持相同超时的定时器按FIFO顺序触发;

Reference

Open Source Agenda is not affiliated with "Timer Benchmarks" Project. README Source: ki7chen/timer-benchmarks
Stars
142
Open Issues
3
Last Commit
3 months ago

Open Source Agenda Badge

Open Source Agenda Rating