Python Atomicwrites Save Abandoned

Powerful Python library for atomic file writes.

Project README

=================== python-atomicwrites

Unmaintained

PyPI wants me to enable 2FA just because I maintain this package <https://github.com/untitaker/python-atomicwrites/issues/61>_, and both that and the mess resulting from a stunt of mine, I thought it'd be a good time to deprecate this package. Python 3 has os.replace and os.rename which probably do well enough of a job for most usecases.


.. image:: https://travis-ci.com/untitaker/python-atomicwrites.svg?branch=master :target: https://travis-ci.com/untitaker/python-atomicwrites .. image:: https://ci.appveyor.com/api/projects/status/vadc4le3c27to59x/branch/master?svg=true :target: https://ci.appveyor.com/project/untitaker/python-atomicwrites/branch/master .. image:: https://readthedocs.org/projects/python-atomicwrites/badge/?version=latest :target: https://python-atomicwrites.readthedocs.io/en/latest/?badge=latest :alt: Documentation Status

Atomic file writes.

.. code-block:: python

from atomicwrites import atomic_write

with atomic_write('foo.txt', overwrite=True) as f:
    f.write('Hello world.')
    # "foo.txt" doesn't exist yet.

# Now it does.

See API documentation <https://python-atomicwrites.readthedocs.io/en/latest/#api>_ for more low-level interfaces.

Features that distinguish it from other similar libraries (see Alternatives and Credit_):

  • Race-free assertion that the target file doesn't yet exist. This can be controlled with the overwrite parameter.

  • Windows support, although not well-tested. The MSDN resources are not very explicit about which operations are atomic. I'm basing my assumptions off a comment <https://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/windowsdesktop/en-US/449bb49d-8acc-48dc-a46f-0760ceddbfc3/movefileexmovefilereplaceexisting-ntfs-same-volume-atomic?forum=windowssdk#a239bc26-eaf0-4920-9f21-440bd2be9cc8>_ by Doug Cook <https://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Profile/doug%20e.%20cook>_, who appears to be a Microsoft employee:

    Question: Is MoveFileEx atomic if the existing and new
    files are both on the same drive?
    
    The simple answer is "usually, but in some cases it will silently fall-back
    to a non-atomic method, so don't count on it".
    
    The implementation of MoveFileEx looks something like this: [...]
    
    The problem is if the rename fails, you might end up with a CopyFile, which
    is definitely not atomic.
    
    If you really need atomic-or-nothing, you can try calling
    NtSetInformationFile, which is unsupported but is much more likely to be
    atomic. 
    
  • Simple high-level API that wraps a very flexible class-based API.

  • Consistent error handling across platforms.

How it works

It uses a temporary file in the same directory as the given path. This ensures that the temporary file resides on the same filesystem.

The temporary file will then be atomically moved to the target location: On POSIX, it will use rename if files should be overwritten, otherwise a combination of link and unlink. On Windows, it uses MoveFileEx_ through stdlib's ctypes with the appropriate flags.

Note that with link and unlink, there's a timewindow where the file might be available under two entries in the filesystem: The name of the temporary file, and the name of the target file.

Also note that the permissions of the target file may change this way. In some situations a chmod can be issued without any concurrency problems, but since that is not always the case, this library doesn't do it by itself.

.. _MoveFileEx: https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/aa365240%28v=vs.85%29.aspx

fsync

On POSIX, fsync is invoked on the temporary file after it is written (to flush file content and metadata), and on the parent directory after the file is moved (to flush filename).

fsync does not take care of disks' internal buffers, but there don't seem to be any standard POSIX APIs for that. On OS X, fcntl is used with F_FULLFSYNC instead of fsync for that reason.

On Windows, _commit <https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/17618685.aspx>_ is used, but there are no guarantees about disk internal buffers.

Alternatives and Credit

Atomicwrites is directly inspired by the following libraries (and shares a minimal amount of code):

  • The Trac project's utility functions <http://www.edgewall.org/docs/tags-trac-0.11.7/epydoc/trac.util-pysrc.html>, also used in Werkzeug <http://werkzeug.pocoo.org/> and mitsuhiko/python-atomicfile <https://github.com/mitsuhiko/python-atomicfile>_. The idea to use ctypes instead of PyWin32 originated there.

  • abarnert/fatomic <https://github.com/abarnert/fatomic>_. Windows support (based on PyWin32) was originally taken from there.

Other alternatives to atomicwrites include:

  • sashka/atomicfile <https://github.com/sashka/atomicfile>_. Originally I considered using that, but at the time it was lacking a lot of features I needed (Windows support, overwrite-parameter, overriding behavior through subclassing).

  • The Boltons library collection <https://github.com/mahmoud/boltons>_ features a class for atomic file writes, which seems to have a very similar overwrite parameter. It is lacking Windows support though.

License

Licensed under the MIT, see LICENSE.

Open Source Agenda is not affiliated with "Python Atomicwrites" Project. README Source: untitaker/python-atomicwrites
Stars
305
Open Issues
5
Last Commit
1 year ago
License
MIT

Open Source Agenda Badge

Open Source Agenda Rating