Coderx7 SimpleNet Save

This repository contains the architectures, Models, logs, etc pertaining to the SimpleNet Paper (Lets keep it simple: Using simple architectures to outperform deeper architectures )

Project README

بسم الله الرحمن الرحیم
پیاده سازی رسمی سیمپل نت در کفی 2016

Lets Keep it simple, Using simple architectures to outperform deeper and more complex architectures (2016).

GitHub Logo

This repository contains the architectures, Models, logs, etc pertaining to the SimpleNet Paper (Lets keep it simple: Using simple architectures to outperform deeper architectures ) : https://arxiv.org/abs/1608.06037

SimpleNet-V1 outperforms deeper and heavier architectures such as AlexNet, VGGNet,ResNet,GoogleNet,etc in a series of benchmark datasets, such as CIFAR10/100, MNIST, SVHN. It also achievs a higher accuracy (currently 72.03/90.32) in imagenet, more than VGGNet, ResNet, MobileNet, AlexNet, NIN, Squeezenet, etc with only 5.7M parameters. It also achieves 74.23/91.748) with 9m version.
Slimer versions of the architecture work very decently against more complex architectures such as ResNet, WRN and MobileNet as well.

Citation

If you find SimpleNet useful in your research, please consider citing:

@article{hasanpour2016lets,
  title={Lets keep it simple, Using simple architectures to outperform deeper and more complex architectures},
  author={Hasanpour, Seyyed Hossein and Rouhani, Mohammad and Fayyaz, Mohsen and Sabokrou, Mohammad},
  journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:1608.06037},
  year={2016}
}

(Check the successor of this architecture at Towards Principled Design of Deep Convolutional Networks: Introducing SimpNet)
 

Other Implementations :

Official Pytorch implementation
 
 

Results Overview :

ImageNet result below was achieved using the Pytorch implementation

Dataset Accuracy
ImageNet-top1 (9m) 74.23
ImageNet-top1 (5m) 72.03
Cifar10 95.51
CIFAR100* 78.37
MNIST 99.75
SVHN 98.21
  • Achieved using Pytorch implementation

ImageNet Result:

SimpleNet outperforms much deeper and larger architectures on the ImageNet dataset:

Model Params Top1 Top5
AlexNet 60M 57.2 80.3
SqeezeNet 1.2M 58.18 80.62
VGGNet16 138M 71.59 90.38
VGGNet16_BN 138M 73.36 91.52
VGGNet19 143M 72.38 90.88
VGGNet19_BN 143M 74.22 91.84
GoogleNet 6.6M 69.78 89.53
WResNet18 11.7M 69.60 89.07
ResNet18 11.7M 69.76 89.08
ResNet34 21.8M 73.31 91.42
SimpleNet_small_050 1.5M 61.67 83.49
SimpleNet_small_075 3.2M 68.51 88.15
SimpleNet_5m 5.7M 72.03 90.32
SimpleNet_9m 9.5M 74.23 91.75

Extended ImageNet Result:

Model #Params ImageNet ImageNet-Real-Labels
simplenetv1_9m_m2(36.3 MB) 9.5m 74.23 / 91.748 81.22 / 94.756
simplenetv1_5m_m2(22 MB) 5.7m 72.03 / 90.324 79.328/ 93.714
simplenetv1_small_m2_075(12.6 MB) 3m 68.506/ 88.15 76.283/ 92.02
simplenetv1_small_m2_05(5.78 MB) 1.5m 61.67 / 83.488 69.31 / 88.195

SimpleNet performs very decently, it outperforms VGGNet, variants of ResNet and MobileNets(1-3)
and is pretty fast as well! and its all using plain old CNN!.
To view the full benchmark results visit the benchmark page.
To view more results checkout the the Pytorch implementation page

Top CIFAR10/100 results:

Method #Params CIFAR10 CIFAR100
VGGNet(16L) /Enhanced 138m 91.4 / 92.45 -
ResNet-110L / 1202L * 1.7/10.2m 93.57 / 92.07 74.84/72.18
SD-110L / 1202L 1.7/10.2m 94.77 / 95.09 75.42 / -
WRN-(16/8)/(28/10) 11/36m 95.19 / 95.83 77.11/79.5
Highway Network N/A 92.40 67.76
FitNet 1M 91.61 64.96
FMP* (1 tests) 12M 95.50 73.61
Max-out(k=2) 6M 90.62 65.46
Network in Network 1M 91.19 64.32
DSN 1M 92.03 65.43
Max-out NIN - 93.25 71.14
LSUV N/A 94.16 N/A
SimpleNet-Arch 1(۞) 5.48M 94.75 -
SimpleNet-Arch 2 (۩) 5.48M 95.51 78.37

*Note that the Fractional max pooling[13] uses deeper architectures and also uses extreme data augmentation.۞ means No zero-padding or normalization with dropout and ۩ means Standard data-augmentation- with dropout. To our knowledge, our architecture has the state of the art result, without aforementioned data-augmentations.

MNIST results:

Method Error rate
DropConnect** 0.21%
Multi-column DNN for Image Classification** 0.23%
APAC** 0.23%
Generalizing Pooling Functions in CNN** 0.29%
Fractional Max-Pooling** 0.32%
Batch-normalized Max-out NIN 0.24%
Max-out network (k=2) 0.45%
Network In Network 0.45%
Deeply Supervised Network 0.39%
RCNN-96 0.31%
SimpleNet * 0.25%

*Note that we didn’t intend on achieving the state of the art performance here as we are using a single optimization policy without fine-tuning hyper parameters or data-augmentation for a specific task, and still we nearly achieved state-of-the-art on MNIST. **Results achieved using an ensemble or extreme data-augmentation

Top SVHN results:

Method Error rate
Network in Network 2.35
Deeply Supervised Net 1.92
ResNet (reported by (2016)) 2.01
ResNet with Stochastic Depth 1.75
Wide ResNet 1.64
SimpleNet 1.79

Table 6-Slimmed version Results on Different Datasets

Model Ours Maxout DSN ALLCNN dasNet ResNet(32) WRN NIN
#Param 310K 460K 6M 1M 1.3M 6M 475K 600K
CIFAR10 91.98 92.33 90.62 92.03 92.75 90.78 91.6 93.15
CIFAR100 64.68 66.82 65.46 65.43 66.29 66.22 67.37 69.11
Other datasets Our result
MNIST(310K)* 99.72
SVHN(310K)* 97.63

*Since we presented their results in their respective sections, we avoided mentioning the results here again.

Cifar10 extended results:

Method Accuracy #Params
VGGNet(16L) 91.4 138m
VGGNET(Enhanced-16L)* 92.45 138m
ResNet-110* 93.57 1.7m
ResNet-1202 92.07 10.2m
Stochastic depth-110L 94.77 1.7m
Stochastic depth-1202L 95.09 10.2m
Wide Residual Net 95.19 11m
Wide Residual Net 95.83 36m
Highway Network 92.40 -
FitNet 91.61 1M
SqueezNet-(tested by us) 79.58 1.3M
ALLCNN 92.75 -
Fractional Max-pooling* (1 tests) 95.50 12M
Max-out(k=2) 90.62 6M
Network in Network 91.19 1M
Deeply Supervised Network 92.03 1M
Batch normalized Max-out NIN 93.25 -
All you need is a good init (LSUV) 94.16 -
Generalizing Pooling Functions in CNN 93.95 -
Spatially-Sparse CNNs 93.72 -
93.63 -
Recurrent CNN for Object Recognition 92.91 -
RCNN-160 92.91 -
SimpleNet-Arch1 94.75 5.4m
SimpleNet-Arch1 using data augmentation 95.51 5.4m

CIFAR100 Extended results:

Method Accuracy
GoogleNet with ELU* 75.72
Spatially-sparse CNNs 75.7
Fractional Max-Pooling(12M) 73.61
Scalable Bayesian Optimization Using DNNs 72.60
All you need is a good init 72.34
Batch-normalized Max-out NIN(k=5) 71.14
Network in Network 64.32
Deeply Supervised Network 65.43
ResNet-110L 74.84
ResNet-1202L 72.18
WRN 77.11/79.5
Highway 67.76
FitNet 64.96
SimpleNet 78.37

** Achieved using several data-augmentation tricks

Flops and Parameter Comparison: [tab:Flops_appndx]

Model MACC COMP ADD DIV Activations Params SIZE(MB)
SimpleNet 1.9G 1.82M 1.5M 1.5M 6.38M 6.4M 24.4
SqueezeNet 861.34M 9.67M 226K 1.51M 12.58M 1.25M 4.7
Inception v4* 12.27G 21.87M 53.42M 15.09M 72.56M 42.71M 163
Inception v3* 5.72G 16.53M 25.94M 8.97M 41.33M 23.83M 91
Incep-Resv2* 13.18G 31.57M 38.81M 25.06M 117.8M 55.97M 214
ResNet-152 11.3G 22.33M 35.27M 22.03M 100.11M 60.19M 230
ResNet-50 3.87G 10.89M 16.21M 10.59M 46.72M 25.56M 97.70
AlexNet 7.27G 17.69M 4.78M 9.55M 20.81M 60.97M 217.00
GoogleNet 16.04G 161.07M 8.83M 16.64M 102.19M 7M 40
NIN 11.06G 28.93M 380K 20K 38.79M 7.6M 29
VGG16 154.7G 196.85M 10K 10K 288.03M 138.36M 512.2

Flops and Parameter Comparison of Models trained on ImageNet

*Inception v3, v4 did not have any Caffe model, so we reported their size related information from MXNet and Tensorflow respectively. Inception-ResNet-V2 would take 60 days of training with 2 Titan X to achieve the reported accuracy. Statistics are obtained using http://dgschwend.github.io/netscope

1# Data-augmentation method used by stochastic depth paper: https://github.com/Pastromhaug/caffe-stochastic-depth.

2# https://github.com/dmlc/mxnet-model-gallery/blob/master/imagenet-1k-inception-v3.md

3# https://github.com/tensorflow/models/tree/master/slim

4# https://github.com/revilokeb/inception_resnetv2_caffe

Side Note:

This was based on my Master's thesis titled "Object classification using Deep Convolutional neural networks" back in 1394/2015.

Citation

If you find SimpleNet useful in your research, please consider citing:

@article{hasanpour2016lets,
  title={Lets keep it simple, Using simple architectures to outperform deeper and more complex architectures},
  author={Hasanpour, Seyyed Hossein and Rouhani, Mohammad and Fayyaz, Mohsen and Sabokrou, Mohammad},
  journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:1608.06037},
  year={2016}
}
Open Source Agenda is not affiliated with "Coderx7 SimpleNet" Project. README Source: Coderx7/SimpleNet

Open Source Agenda Badge

Open Source Agenda Rating