CodeChecker is an analyzer tooling, defect database and viewer extension for the Clang Static Analyzer and Clang Tidy
CodeChecker provides a new view in the "Analysis information tab" which lists all checkers that were enabled during analysis.
CodeChecker provides a new view to display all enabled checkers for a set of selected runs. The new table lists all checkers that were enabled in a set of selected analysis runs, shows the number of outstanding reports and the number of closed reports per enabled checker.
How is this new view different compared to the existing "Checker Statistics View"? The Checker Statistics View only displays checkers that produced reports for the selected runs. This new view additionally lists all checkers that were enabled in the last analysis for the selected runs.
Thanks to a new optimization, the run storage duration can be up to 50% faster.
None
-fno-tree-dominator-opts
by @bo-dani in https://github.com/Ericsson/codechecker/pull/4141
checker_id
normalisation by @whisperity in https://github.com/Ericsson/codechecker/pull/4198
Full Changelog: https://github.com/Ericsson/codechecker/compare/v6.23.1...v6.24.0-rc1
Full Changelog: https://github.com/Ericsson/codechecker/compare/v6.23.0...v6.23.1
We are happy to announce that CodeChecker added native support for the GCC Static Analyzer! This analyzer checks code in the C family of languages, but its latest release at the time of writing is still best used only on C code. Despite it being a bit immature for C++, we did some internal surveys where the GCC Static Analyzer seemed to be promising.
We expect this analyzer to be slower than clang-tidy, but faster than the Clang Static Analyzer. You can enable it by adding --analyzers gcc
to your CodeChecker check
or CodeChecker analyze
commands. For further configuration, check out the GCC Static Analyzer configuration page.
GNU GCC 13.0.0. (the minimum version we support) can be tricky to obtain and to make CodeChecker use it, as CodeChecker looks for the g++
binary, not g++-13
. As a workaround, you can set the environmental variable CC_ANALYZER_BIN
which will make CodeChecker use the given analyzer path (e.g. CC_ANALYZER_BIN="gcc:/usr/bin/g++-13"
). You can use CodeChecker analyzers
to check whether you have the correct binary configured.
You can enable gcc checkers by explicitly mentioning them at the analyze command e.g.
CodeChecker analyze -e gcc
gcc checkers are only added to the exterme profile. After evaluation, some checkers may be added to other profiles too.
Under the same breath, we added partial support for the SARIF file format (as opposed to using plists) to report-converter
, with greater support planned for future releases.
In previous CodeChecker versions, you could set the review status of a report using two methods: using in-source comments, or setting a review status rule in the GUI. The former sets the specific report's review status, the latter sets all matching reports' review status.
This release introduces a third way, a review status config file! One of the motivations behind this is that we wanted to have a way to set review statuses on reports in specific directories (which was not possible on the GUI). CodeChecker uses a YAML config file that can be set during analysis:
$version: 1
rules:
- filters:
filepath: /path/to/project/test/*
checker_name: core.DivideZero
actions:
review_status: intentional
reason: Division by zero in test files is automatically intentional.
- filters:
filepath: /path/to/project/important/module/*
actions:
review_status: confirmed
reason: All reports in this module should be investigated.
- filters:
filepath: "*/project/test/*"
actions:
review_status: suppress
reason: If a filter starts with asterix, then it should be quoted due to YAML format.
- filters:
report_hash: b85851b34789e35c6acfa1a4aaf65382
actions:
review_status: false_positive
reason: This report is false positive.
This is how you can use this config file for an analysis:
CodeChecker analyze compile_commands.json --review-status-config review_status.yaml -o reports
The config file allows for a great variety of ways to match a report and set its review status. For further details see this documentation.
In this release the unknown Checker status has been eliminated. CodeChecker will enable only those checkers that are either present in the default profile (see CodeChecker checkers --profile default) or enabled using the --enable argument (through another profile or explicitly through a checker name).
In previous CodeChecker versions, when you ran an analysis, we assigned three states to every checker: it's either enabled, disabled, or neither (unknown). We kept the third state around to give some leeway for the analyzers to decide which checkers to enable or disable, usually to manage their checker dependencies. We now see that this behavior can be (and usually is) confusing, party because it's hard to tell which checkers were actually enabled.
You can list the checkers enabled by default using the CodeChecker checkers command:
CodeChecker 6.22.0 output:
CodedeChecker checkers |grep clang-diagnostic-varargs -A7
clang-diagnostic-varargs
--> Status: unknown <---
Analyzer: clang-tidy
Description:
Labels:
doc_url:https://clang.llvm.org/docs/DiagnosticsReference.html#wvarargs
severity:MEDIUM
=>
CodeChecker 6.23.0 output:
CodeChecker checkers |grep clang-diagnostic-varargs -A7
clang-diagnostic-varargs
---> Status: disabled <---
Analyzer: clang-tidy
Description:
Labels:
doc_url:https://clang.llvm.org/docs/DiagnosticsReference.html#wvarargs
severity:MEDIUM
Following a thorough survey, we identified numerous areas to improve on our run/tag comparisons. We landed several patches to improve the results of diffs both on the CLI and the web GUI (which should be almost always identical). Despite that this feature has the appearance of a simple set operation, diff is a powerful tool that can express a lot of properties on the state of your codebase, and has a few intricacies. For this reason, we also greatly improved our docs around it.
A detailed description of the issues are described in this ticket: https://github.com/Ericsson/codechecker/issues/3884
One example is that the if the suppression was removed for a finding, the diff did not show the reappearing result as new (in local/local diff):
// Code version 1:
void c() {
int i = 0; // deadstore, this value is never read
// codechecker_suppress [all] SUPPRESS ALL
i = 5;
}
// Code version 2 (suppression removed):
void c() {
int i = 0; // deadstore, this value is never read
i = 5;
}
CodeChecker diff -b version1.c -n version2.c --new
Did not show the deadstore finding as new.
We landed several patches to improve the readability and usability of the GUI, with more improvements to come in later releases! The currently selected event's visual highlight pops a little more now in the report view, and we no longer show unused columns in the run view.
In this image, you can see how much the selected event "pops" after this release, and also, how other events' opacity was a lowered a bit, which allows arrows to be seen through them.
Especially in the case of clang-tidy, we have observed some unreasonable number of reports by certain checkers. In some instances, we saw hundreds of thousands (!) of reports reported by some individual checkers, and its more than unlikely that anyone will inspect these reports individually (you probably got the message about using parantheses around macros after the first 15 000 reports).
We found that these checkers were usually enabled by mistake, and put unnecessary strain both on the storage of results to the server, and on the database once stored. Moving forward, CodeChecker servers will reject stores of runs that have more than 500 000 reports. This limit is a default value that you can change or even set to unlimited. Our intent is not to discourage legitemately huge stores, only those that are whose size is likely this large by mistake.
When creating a new product called My product
at endpoint myproduct
, you can set the report limit from the CLI with the following invocation:
CodeChecker cmd products add -n "My product" --report-limit 1000000 myproduct
For an already existing product, you can change the limit by clicking the pencil at the products page:
--analyzers
flag and one of them is missing, CodeChecker now emits an error.CodeChecker analyze compile_commands.json -o reports --analyzers clangsa
CodeChecker analyze compile_commands.json -o reports --analyzers clangsa==14.0.0
--all
and --details
were deprecated for CodeChecker analyzers
With the introduction of the GCC Static Analyzer, we think that the --all
flag was more confusing than useful -- its a reasonable assumption that any system will have a version of GCC available. The default behaviour prior to this release was to only list analyzers that were available for analysis: the binary was found, met the version criteria, and was functional. The --all
flag listed all supported analyzers, even if they were not available. We changed the default behaviour to always list all supported checkers, and --all
is ignored. We emit helpful warnings for analyzers that CodeChecker supports, but can't analyze with.
--details
could be used to print additional version information of the binary, but we didn't feel like it provided any value above what the non-detailed query gave, and it was impossible to pretty print. After this release, this flag will also be ignored.
ldlogger.so
path https://github.com/Ericsson/codechecker/pull/3976
Full Changelog: https://github.com/Ericsson/codechecker/compare/v6.22.2...v6.23.0
Fixed the SARIF file location according to the GCC documentation. Changed GCC's output format to sarif-stderr. Temporarily ignored compiler warnings in GCC.
Replaced the multiprocessing library with multiprocess. This resolved issues in multiprocess library usage on different platforms but mostly on OSX. Added in https://github.com/Ericsson/codechecker/pull/4076
Fixing a crash when CC_ANALYZERS_FROM_PATH env variable is set in https://github.com/Ericsson/codechecker/pull/4084
Corrected a bug about the --enable-all flag not disabling specific warnings in #4080 by @bruntib Fixed non-determinism in the appearance of clang-tidy checkers. Prevented duplicate addition of extra arguments in cppcheck. Resolved an issue with the AnalyzerContext lazy initialization.
An error was fixed when loading the report in the report view that caused the review status dropdown menu's value to fail to update when switching to a report with a different status. Fixed in in https://github.com/Ericsson/codechecker/pull/4082 by @cservakt
The issue with building ReadTheDocs has been rectified. You can view the latest docs here: https://codechecker.readthedocs.io/en/latest/ In addition, we have implemented modifications to the PyPI action in order for a more reliable package publishing by @vodorok
Full Changelog: https://github.com/Ericsson/codechecker/compare/v6.23.0-rc1...v6.23.0-rc2
We are happy to announce that CodeChecker added native support for the GCC Static Analyzer! This analyzer checks code in the C family of languages, but its latest release at the time of writing is still best used only on C code. Despite it being a bit immature for C++, we did some internal surveys where the GCC Static Analyzer seemed to be promising.
We expect this analyzer to be slower than clang-tidy, but faster than the Clang Static Analyzer. You can enable it by adding --analyzers gcc
to your CodeChecker check
or CodeChecker analyze
commands. For further configuration, check out the GCC Static Analyzer configuration page.
GNU GCC 13.0.0. (the minimum version we support) can be tricky to obtain and to make CodeChecker use it, as CodeChecker looks for the g++
binary, not g++-13
. As a workaround, you can set the environmental variable CC_ANALYZER_BIN
which will make CodeChecker use the given analyzer path (e.g. CC_ANALYZER_BIN="gcc:/usr/bin/g++-13"
). You can use CodeChecker analyzers
to check whether you have the correct binary configured.
You can enable gcc checkers by explicitly mentioning them at the analyze command e.g.
CodeChecker analyze -e gcc
gcc checkers are only added to the exterme profile. After evaluation, some checkers may be added to other profiles too.
Under the same breath, we added partial support for the SARIF file format (as opposed to using plists) to report-converter
, with greater support planned for future releases.
In previous CodeChecker versions, you could set the review status of a report using two methods: using in-source comments, or setting a review status rule in the GUI. The former sets the specific report's review status, the latter sets all matching reports' review status.
This release introduces a third way, a review status config file! One of the motivations behind this is that we wanted to have a way to set review statuses on reports in specific directories (which was not possible on the GUI). CodeChecker uses a YAML config file that can be set during analysis:
# review_status.yaml
- filepath_filter: /path/to/project/test/*
checker_filter: core.DivideZero
message: Division by zero in test files is automatically intentional.
review_status: intentional
- filepath_filter: /path/to/project/important/module/*
message: All reports in this module should be investigated.
review_status: confirmed
- filepath_filter: "*/project/test/*"
message: If a filter starts with asterix, then it should be quoted due to YAML format.
review_status: suppress
- report_hash_filter: b85851b34789e35c6acfa1a4aaf65382
message: This report is false positive.
review_status: false_positive
This is how you can use this config file for an analysis:
CodeChecker analyze compile_commands.json --review-status-config review_status.yaml -o reports
The config file allows for a great variety of ways to match a report and set its review status. For further details see this documentation.
In previous CodeChecker versions, when you ran an analysis, we assigned three states to every checker: it's either enabled, disabled, or neither (unknown). We kept the third state around to give some leeway for the analyzers to decide which checkers to enable or disable, usually to manage their checker dependencies. We now see that this behavior can be (and usually is) confusing, party because it's hard to tell which checkers were actually enabled.
In this release the unknown status has been eliminated, and we deal with dependencies using other means. Moving on, CodeChecker will enable only those checkers that are either present in the default profile (see CodeChecker checkers --profile default
) or enabled using the --enable
argument.
Following a thorough survey, we identified numerous areas to improve on our run/tag comparisons. We landed several patches to improve the results of diffs both on the CLI and the web GUI (which should be almost always identical). Despite that this feature has the appearance of a simple set operation, diff is a powerful tool that can express a lot of properties on the state of your codebase, and has a few intricacies. For this reason, we also greatly improved our docs around it.
We landed several patches to improve the readability and usability of the GUI, with more improvements to come in later releases! The currently selected event's visual highlight pops a little more now in the report view, and we no longer show unused columns in the run view.
In this image, you can see how much the selected event "pops" after this release, and also, how other events' opacity was a lowered a bit, which allows arrows to be seen through them.
Especially in the case of clang-tidy, we have observed some unreasonable number of reports by certain checkers. In some instances, we saw hundreds of thousands (!) of reports reported by some individual checkers, and its more than unlikely that anyone will inspect these reports individually (you probably got the message about using parantheses around macros after the first 15 000 reports).
We found that these checkers were usually enabled by mistake, and put unnecessary strain both on the storage of results to the server, and on the database once stored. Moving forward, CodeChecker servers will reject stores of runs that have more than 500 000 reports. This limit is a default value that you can change or even set to unlimited. Our intent is not to discourage legitemately huge stores, only those that are whose size is likely this large by mistake.
When creating a new product called My product
at endpoint myproduct
, you can set the report limit from the CLI with the following invocation:
CodeChecker cmd products add -n "My product" --report-limit 1000000 myproduct
For an already existing product, you can change the limit by clicking the pencil at the products page:
clang-diagnostic-<warning-name>
(instead of W<warning-name>
)After analysis, reports from clang compiler warnings (well before this release) were attributed to clang-diagnostic-<warning-name>
instead of -W<warning-name>
that is usually given to the compiler to enable <warning-name>
. We did this so that warnings from different compilers could be differentiated. However, you could only enable <warning-name>
as a checker by referencing it as W<warning-name>
. In this release, we fixed this inconsistency.
Moving forward, you can enable a clang warning with the following syntax:
CodeChecker analyzer -e clang-diagnostic-deprecated-copy
instead of
CodeChecker analyze -e Wdeprecated-copy
which is no longer supported. You can list all clang-diagnostics with the CodeChecker checkers
command.
--all
and --details
were deprecated for CodeChecker analyzers
With the introduction of the GCC Static Analyzer, we think that the --all
flag was more confusing than useful -- its a reasonable assumption that any system will have a version of GCC available. The default behaviour prior to this release was to only list analyzers that were available for analysis: the binary was found, met the version criteria, and was functional. The --all
flag listed all supported analyzers, even if they were not available. We changed the default behaviour to always list all supported checkers, and --all
is ignored. We emit helpful warnings for analyzers that CodeChecker supports, but can't analyze with.
--details
could be used to print additional version information of the binary, but we didn't feel like it provided any value above what the non-detailed query gave, and it was impossible to pretty print. After this release, this flag will also be ignored.
ldlogger.so
path https://github.com/Ericsson/codechecker/pull/3976
Full Changelog: https://github.com/Ericsson/codechecker/compare/v6.22.2...v6.23.0-rc1
CodeChecker failed to build on Ubuntu 22.04 in its previous release because of two issues: some of our dependencies broke with the release of python3.9, and we didn't support GNU Make-s new way of creating build jobs. These issues are all fixed now, so CodeChecker should work with the latest version of python and GNU Make!
-fno-lifetime-dse
#3913, -Wno-error
, -fprofile
#3937, #3941)
report-converter
crashed when SourceLine
has no source_path
attribute) #3917linux_spawn
alongside exec*
calls in the logger #3930logger.so
in LD_PRELOAD
#3919
LD_PRELOAD
environment variable where ldlogger.so
was set with a relative path. Due to the relative path LD_LIBRARY_PATH
has to be set too. However, this latter environment variable is overridden by the build systems many times. So CodeChecker uses an absolute path in LD_PRELOAD
and eliminates the usage of LD_LIBRARY_PATH
.lxml
to 4.9.2
#3896Full Changelog: https://github.com/Ericsson/codechecker/compare/v6.22.0...v6.22.2
[fix][server] Fix webapp crash when using component filter
CodeChecker webapp was crashing when using the component filter, which has been fixed in this release. #3887
[doc] Make every second release highlight green #3882
After another round of optimizations, CodeChecker store
is ~2 times faster than in v6.21.0. Combined with the previous release, storing may be as much as 4 times faster than v6.20.0., with larger result directories seeing a greater degree of improvement.
This should allow those that use CodeChecker in CI loops to see fewer timeouts due to long storages, or lower timeout tresholds significantly.
CodeChecker now supports an analysis mode where for each source file, it tries to find the closest compile_commands.json file up in the directory hierarchy starting from the source file.
If your project is structured such that multiple folders act as their own root folder (hence the name multiroot), CodeChecker should be able to support that out of the box. clangd and clang-tidy already works this way: https://clangd.llvm.org/installation.html#compile_commandsjson
This feature also affects the CodeChecker Visual Studio Code plugin, where analysis will be done on multiroot projects as well Ericsson/CodecheckerVSCodePlugin#113.
Previously the input of analysis must have been a compilation database JSON file. This PR supports the following new CodeChecker analyze
invocations, as long as a corresponding compilation database file is found:
# Analyze a single file.
CodeChecker analyze analyze.cpp -o reports
# Analyze all source files under a directory.
CodeChecker analyze my_project -o reports
CodeChecker is now able to parse additional fields from plist files especially relevant to dynamic analyses. https://github.com/Ericsson/codechecker/blob/master/docs/analyzer/user_guide.md#dynamic-analysis-results
<dict>
<key>diagnostics</key>
<array>
<dict>
<key>category</key>
<string>unknown</string>
<key>check_name</key>
<string>UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer</string>
<key>report-annotation</key>
<dict>
<key>testcase</key>
<string>yhegalkoei</string>
<key>timestamp</key>
<string>1970-04-26T17:27:55</string>
</dict>
<key>path</key>
<array>
...
</array>
</dict>
Unlike for static analyzers, the time of the detection can be a crucial piece of information, as a report may be a result of another preceding report. Users that record the timestamp of the detection and store it in CodeChecker under the new 'Timestamp' field will be able to sort reports by it. CodeChecker now also supports the 'Testsuite' field.
You can read more about this feature in its PR #3849, and the relevant docs PR #3871.
CodeChecker checkers --only-enabled DEPRECATED.
Show only the enabled checkers. use CodeChecker checkers --details to list the checker status (enabled/disabled)CodeChecker checkers --only-disabled.
use CodeChecker checkers --details to list the checker status.CodeChecker cmd diff -s, --suppressed DEPRECATED.
Lists the suppressed reports.
Use the --review-status [REVIEW_STATUS [REVIEW_STATUS ...]]
flag to filter the results.CodeChecker cmd diff --filter FILTER
DEPRECATED. Filter diff results.
Use the --review-status [REVIEW_STATUS [REVIEW_STATUS ...]]
flag
to filter the results.CodeChecker cmd sum --disable-unique
DEPRECATED. Use the '--uniqueing' option to get uniqueing results.--tidy-config flag
#3822
CodeChecker analyze [--tidy-config TIDY_CONFIG]
DEPRECATED and removed.
Use the CodeChecker analyzers --analyzer-config clang-tidy
to list the analyzer options
Use e.g. CodeChecker analyze --analyzer-config clang-tidy:WarningsAsErrors=true
to set a parameter.
Alternatively you can use .clang-tidy config files too--enable/--disable
is not recognized (usually because of a typo) by any of the analyzers, CodeChecker now emits an error. While we strongly advise you against it, you can demote this error to a warning, restoring the behaviour similar to previous releases, with the flag --no-missing-checker-error
(#3866).bugprone-standalone-empty
: default, extreme, sensitivebugprone-unsafe-functions
: extreme, security, sensitivecert-msc24-c
: alias of bugprone-unsafe-functions
cert-msc33-c
: alias of bugprone-unsafe-functions
cppcoreguidelines-avoid-capture-default-when-capturing-this
: extreme, sensitivecppcoreguidelines-avoid-capturing-lambda-coroutines
: default, extreme, sensitivecppcoreguidelines-avoid-reference-coroutine-parameters
: default, extreme, sensitivecppcoreguidelines-rvalue-reference-param-not-moved
: extreme, sensitivellvmlibc-inline-function-decl
: stylemisc-use-anonymous-namespace
: default, extreme, sensitive# Analyze one source file.
CodeChecker analyze main.c -o reports
# analyze all source files under a directory.
CodeChecker analyze my_project -o reports
<analyzer>:<checker>:<option>=<value>
. This format is checked and an error message is emitted if the format is not met.lxml
to 4.9.1
#3799python3-setuptools
dependency #3729After another round of optimizations, CodeChecker store
is ~2 times faster than in v6.21.0. Combined with the previous release, storing may be as much as 4 times faster than v6.20.0., with larger result directories seeing a greater degree of improvement.
This should allow those that use CodeChecker in CI loops to see fewer timeouts due to long storages, or lower timeout tresholds significantly.
CodeChecker now supports an analysis mode where for each source file, it tries to find the closest compile_commands.json file up in the directory hierarchy starting from the source file.
If your project is structured such that multiple folders act as their own root folder (hence the name multiroot), CodeChecker should be able to support that out of the box. clangd and clang-tidy already works this way: https://clangd.llvm.org/installation.html#compile_commandsjson
This feature also affects the CodeChecker Visual Studio Code plugin, where analysis will be done on multiroot projects as well Ericsson/CodecheckerVSCodePlugin#113.
Previously the input of analysis must have been a compilation database JSON file. This PR supports the following new CodeChecker analyze
invocations, as long as a corresponding compilation database file is found:
# Analyze a single file.
CodeChecker analyze analyze.cpp -o reports
# Analyze all source files under a directory.
CodeChecker analyze my_project -o reports
CodeChecker is now able to parse additional fields from plist files especially relevant to dynamic analyses.
<key>diagnostics</key>
<array>
<dict>
<key>category</key>
<string>Memory error</string>
...
<dict>
<key>timestamp</key>
<string>2000-01-01 10:00</string>
<key>testsuite</key>
<string>TS-1</key>
...
</dict>
</dict>
</array>
Unlike for static analyzers, the time of the detection can be a crucial piece of information, as a report may be a result of another preceding report. Users that record the timestamp of the detection and store it in CodeChecker under the new 'Timestamp' field will be able to sort reports by it. CodeChecker now also supports the 'Testsuite' field.
You can read more about this feature in its PR: #3849.
CodeChecker checkers --only-enabled DEPRECATED.
Show only the enabled checkers. use CodeChecker checkers --details to list the checker status (enabled/disabled)CodeChecker checkers --only-disabled.
use CodeChecker checkers --details to list the checker status.CodeChecker cmd diff -s, --suppressed DEPRECATED.
Lists the suppressed reports.
Use the --review-status [REVIEW_STATUS [REVIEW_STATUS ...]]
flag to filter the results.CodeChecker cmd diff --filter FILTER
DEPRECATED. Filter diff results.
Use the --review-status [REVIEW_STATUS [REVIEW_STATUS ...]]
flag
to filter the results.CodeChecker cmd sum --disable-unique
DEPRECATED. Use the '--uniqueing' option to get uniqueing results.--tidy-config flag
#3822
CodeChecker analyze [--tidy-config TIDY_CONFIG]
DEPRECATED and removed.
Use the CodeChecker analyzers --analyzer-config clang-tidy
to list the analyzer options
Use e.g. CodeChecker analyze --analyzer-config clang-tidy:WarningsAsErrors=true
to set a parameter.
Alternatively you can use .clang-tidy config files toobugprone-standalone-empty
: default, extreme, sensitivebugprone-unsafe-functions
: extreme, security, sensitivecert-msc24-c
: alias of bugprone-unsafe-functions
cert-msc33-c
: alias of bugprone-unsafe-functions
cppcoreguidelines-avoid-capture-default-when-capturing-this
: extreme, sensitivecppcoreguidelines-avoid-capturing-lambda-coroutines
: default, extreme, sensitivecppcoreguidelines-avoid-reference-coroutine-parameters
: default, extreme, sensitivecppcoreguidelines-rvalue-reference-param-not-moved
: extreme, sensitivellvmlibc-inline-function-decl
: stylemisc-use-anonymous-namespace
: default, extreme, sensitive# Analyze one source file.
CodeChecker analyze main.c -o reports
# analyze all source files under a directory.
CodeChecker analyze my_project -o reports
<analyzer>:<checker>:<option>=<value>
. This format is checked and an error message is emitted if the format is not met.lxml
to 4.9.1
#3799python3-setuptools
dependency #3729CodeChecker store
about twice as fast (#3777)
This small change from a regex to a string search is expected to shave off the time it takes to run a CodeChecker store
command by as much as 50%!bugprone-assignment-in-if-condition
: extreme (no longer in the sensitive
and default
profiles)bugprone-signal-handler
: default (new), security (new), sensitive, extremebugprone-suspicious-realloc-usage
(new): default, sensitive, extremebugprone-stringview-nullptr
(new): default, sensitive, extremebugprone-unchecked-optional-access
(new): extremecert-sig30-c
: removed from all profiles (as it is an alias to bugprone-signal-handler)cppcoreguidelines-avoid-const-or-ref-data-members
: sensitive (new), extremecppcoreguidelines-avoid-do-while
(new): extrememisc-const-correctness
: removed from all profiles (it was too extreme even for extreme)misc-misleading-bidirectional
: default, security (new), sensitive, extrememisc-misleading-identifier"
(new): default, security, sensitive, extremealpha.unix.Errno
: sensitive (new), extremecore.uninitialized.NewArraySize
(new): default, sensitive, extremealpha.unix.cstring.UninitializedRead
(new): extreme--help
messages.README
(#3763)
CodeChecker cmd diff
to the server got an incorrect results, which this PR fixes.CodeChecker parse --export html
produced an invalid HTMl file.