Inspection Testing Save

Inspection Testing for Haskell

Project README

Inspection Testing for Haskell

This GHC plugin allows you to embed assertions about the intermediate code into your Haskell code, and have them checked by GHC. This is called inspection testing (as it automates what you do when you manually inspect the intermediate code).


See the Test.Inspection module for the documentation, but there really isn't much more to it than:

{-# LANGUAGE TemplateHaskell #-}
module Simple where

import Test.Inspection
import Data.Maybe

lhs, rhs :: (a -> b) -> Maybe a -> Bool
lhs f x = isNothing (fmap f x)
rhs f Nothing = True
rhs f (Just _) = False

inspect $ 'lhs === 'rhs

If you compile this, you will reassurringly read:

$ ghc Simple.hs
[1 of 1] Compiling Simple           ( Simple.hs, Simple.o )
examples/Simple.hs:14:1: lhs === rhs passed.
inspection testing successful
      expected successes: 1

See the examples/ directory for more examples of working proofs.

If an assertion fails, for example

bad1, bad2 :: Int
bad1 = 2 + 2
bad2 = 5

inspect $ 'bad1 === 'bad2

then the compiler will tell you so, and abort the compilation:

$ ghc Simple.hs -dsuppress-idinfo
[5 of 5] Compiling Simple           ( examples/Simple.hs, examples/Simple.o )
examples/Simple.hs:14:1: lhs === rhs passed.
examples/Simple.hs:20:1: bad1 === bad2 failed:
        bad1 :: Int
        bad1 = I# 4#

        bad2 :: Int
        bad2 = I# 5#

examples/Simple.hs: error:
    inspection testing unsuccessful
          expected successes: 1
         unexpected failures: 1

What can I check for?

Currently, inspection-testing supports

  • checking two definitions to be equal (useful in the context of generic programming)
  • checking the absence of a certain type (useful in the context of list or stream fusion)
  • checking the absence of a a use of certian functions
  • checking the absence of allocation (generally useful)
  • checking the absence of typeclass-overloaded code

In general, the checks need to be placed in the same module as the checked-definition.

Possible further applications includes

  • checking that all recursive functions are (efficiently called) join-points
  • asserting strictness properties (e.g. in Data.Map.Strict)
  • peforming some of these checks only within recursive loops

Let me know if you need any of these, or have further ideas.

Help, I am drowning in Core!

inspection-testing prints the Core more or less like GHC would, and the same flags can be used to control the level of detail. In particular, you might want to pass to GHC a selection of the following flags:

-dsuppress-idinfo -dsuppress-coercions -dsuppress-type-applications
-dsuppress-module-prefixes -dsuppress-type-signatures -dsuppress-uniques

It does not seem to do anything (on GHC < 8.4)

Add this line to your module:

{-# OPTIONS_GHC -O -fplugin Test.Inspection.Plugin #-}

Can I comment or help?

Sure! We can use the GitHub issue tracker for discussions, and obviously contributions are welcome.

Open Source Agenda is not affiliated with "Inspection Testing" Project. README Source: nomeata/inspection-testing
Open Issues
Last Commit
3 months ago

Open Source Agenda Badge

Open Source Agenda Rating